PT
← All writings

Proverbs of October · Day 2

Not Everything That Works Is Right

“If you listen to me, you will know what is right, just, and fair. You will know what you should do.”

Proverbs 2:9 · GNT

Day 2, so Proverbs 2...

Reflection

The project was delivered on time. The client praised it. The person in charge received congratulations. Within the team, however, the hardest tasks always fell to the same two people. Those closest to the manager managed to avoid them. The delivery was successful. The way they achieved it left an injustice that the results report does not show.

Proverbs 2 follows a father's instruction to his child: receive the teaching, seek understanding, and pursue wisdom with determination. The chapter says that the Lord gives wisdom. By verse 9, the promise reaches the way we make decisions: knowing what is right, just, and fair, and knowing what we should do. The knowledge we receive should also help us examine how we achieve things.

1A good result does not justify every means.

A message may get a response because it humiliates someone in a group chat. A salesperson may close a deal by leaving out an important limitation of the service. A parent may make a child stop crying through fear of the parent's reaction. Each approach had an immediate effect. We still need to ask whether the person was treated with truth and respect.

That examination tends to make us uncomfortable when we received the benefit. If the sale came through, the instruction was followed, or the deadline was met, we are tempted to stop evaluating. But the verse adds criteria that the score alone cannot provide. Who was heard? Who carried a burden that should not have been theirs? Did someone agree without knowing something that would have changed their decision?

Results matter. We need to honor commitments, do our work well, and care for what has been entrusted to us. The danger is letting the result remove the question about the means. A wrong action still needs correction even when it brought an advantage. Recognizing that may require returning undeserved credit, clarifying a promise, or redistributing the work.

2Fairness becomes visible when your decision considers the other person too.

Return to the team that delivered the project. Perhaps the manager assigned tasks without checking each person's workload. Perhaps the manager favored whoever complained most loudly. The quiet person ended up paying for the decision-maker's convenience. To review the situation, the manager needs to look beyond the deadline: who did what, what conditions they faced, and how the criteria were applied.

At home, this happens when we demand from a patient child what we overlook in a child who reacts badly. In a conversation, it happens when we require every detail from the other person but ask them to accept our account without questions. In friendship, it happens when a rule becomes strict for someone who challenges us and flexible for someone who benefits us. Wisdom helps us recognize those double standards before we call them good judgment.

Fair treatment requires us to consider real differences. One person may need support, another may have more experience, and a third may be facing a limitation we do not know about. Dividing everything identically does not always solve the problem. We need to examine those differences honestly, listen to the people involved, and be able to explain our decision. Favoritism must not be hidden behind a convenient excuse.

3Wisdom needs to shape your criteria before the rush begins.

The chapter speaks of seeking understanding with determination. That takes time and a willingness to learn. If we leave every evaluation until the moment we must solve something, urgency easily becomes our only argument. Needing to deliver becomes the justification for a false promise. Needing to end the conversation becomes the justification for a cruel response.

We can prepare for our next choices more carefully. Before agreeing to a deadline, listen to the people who will do the work. Before promising a service, explain its conditions. Before settling a conflict at home, hear the people involved. These steps do not remove every unexpected problem. They help prevent poor preparation from repeatedly becoming permission to treat someone badly.

The verse also ends with action: knowing what you should do. Sometimes we lack information and need to seek guidance. At other times, we already know that information needs correcting or that someone was treated unfairly. In that case, more reflection must not become a polished way of putting things off. Ask God for wisdom, examine the facts, and take the step that the truth already makes clear.

Choose what is fair, even when the shortcut seems to work.

Good to Great, by Jim Collins, published in Portuguese as Empresas Feitas para Vencer

in the section on core ideology and enduring greatness, Collins distinguishes the values an organization preserves from the strategies it adapts. He also observes that enduring companies can hold different values. That qualification matters: longevity and performance alone do not prove that everything a company does is morally right. The book helps us recognize the need for stable criteria. Proverbs supplies the foundation that guides our discernment through what is right, just, and fair. We can change how we work without turning present convenience into permission to harm someone. (Quoted here from the Brazilian edition, so the wording is a translation rather than the authors' original English. The ideas are presented as a paraphrase, without a direct quotation.)

A Christ-Centered Connection

One Sabbath, Jesus was teaching in a synagogue. A woman there had been bent over for eighteen years and could not straighten up. Jesus called her, placed his hands on her, and healed her. She straightened up and began praising God. The synagogue official reacted angrily. He told the people to seek healing during the other six days, not on the Sabbath (Luke 13:10 to 14).

Jesus exposed a difference in how they applied that requirement. People untied their animals on the Sabbath to take them to water. Why should the woman have to keep waiting? His question was direct: "should she not be released on the Sabbath?" (Luke 13:16). The care they allowed for animals was being refused to a person standing before them.

Christ did not place the smooth running of the gathering above that woman. Nor did he treat the official's harshness as proof of faithfulness to God. He revealed a concrete inconsistency: the reasoning that permitted meeting one need was used to prevent care for another. His response left his opponents ashamed, while the crowd rejoiced at what Jesus was doing (Luke 13:15 to 17).

This calls us to examine the criteria by which we lead our homes, our work, and our religious lives. A rule can protect people and help them live together. We need to respect that purpose. But we also need to notice when we apply double standards, allowing ourselves the consideration we deny someone else. Jesus' mercy does not authorize secret favors or the abandonment of necessary safeguards. It confronts the inconsistency that uses a respectable justification to refuse a good thing we could do.

And Jesus offers us more than an example of good judgment. Romans 5:8 says that Christ died for us while we were still sinners. He came to people who had also applied double standards, protected their advantages, and treated others unfairly. His love comes before we get things right. We can therefore confess those choices without trying to preserve an image of perfection. The forgiveness we receive from Christ gives us room to repair what we can and learn to treat our neighbors with truth and care.

Which decision did you consider good simply because it worked for you? Choose a recent situation at home, at work, or in a conversation. The aim is to examine one real choice, without turning the day into an attempt to judge your entire life.

  • 1Check the truth: was there important information that the other person did not receive? If there was, clarify it.
  • 2Check the treatment: was the same criterion applied to you and the other person? Listen to whoever was affected before deciding that everything was fair.
  • 3Make one possible correction today: redistribute a task, acknowledge someone's work, or apologize for a demand made with double standards.

If the decision involves other responsibilities, seek guidance and respect the necessary safeguards. Asking for help is also part of discernment. Do not use the complexity of the situation to leave untouched the part that is already clear.

Choose what is fair, even when the shortcut seems to work.

What does Proverbs 2:9 mean?

In a father's instruction to his child, the verse connects receiving wisdom with knowing what is right, just, and fair. That understanding reaches practical choices. A favorable outcome is not enough to assess a decision. We also need to examine the information given and the treatment of the people involved.

Why can a good result hide an unfair decision?

An immediate benefit can reach one person while the burden falls on another. A deadline met can conceal favoritism in assigning tasks. A sale can conceal withheld information. Wisdom asks us to examine the means, listen to those involved, and correct unfair treatment, even when the outcome favored us.

What did Jesus teach by healing the woman on the Sabbath?

Jesus confronted the inconsistency of allowing care for animals while refusing freedom to a sick woman. His action calls us to examine double standards in our decisions. His love, also demonstrated in giving his life for us, allows us to confess those failures and begin repairing what we can.

Wisdom Pill

A Win That Includes Everyone — For grown-ups to read with children

→
WhatsApp Telegram Email